I have a little feedback for your water series. the slides are impossible to read and I haven't been able to download and print them out. it's nice to see you discussing the slide but I can't read it, even when I projected on the big screen with my phone and zoom in. It's probably made for a desk computer?
perhaps you could offer it as a PDF or a book, that we could purchase.
by the way I've been experimenting with the water structuring disc. I feel like it should be in sunlight?
I also had an idea that it would be good if I could fit it into a container so the water actually touched the disc, but I don't know for certain. I don't have the apparatus to test water such as Schwank or Emoto.
I'm relying on my own sensitive observation and taste buds!
thank you so much for all you're putting into the water series I hope there's more coming!
Thanks for your experience with the slides, I did set them up for mobile as well, but I get your point and the access to the information is essential. I'll work on getting a pdf together that will be supplied to those who purchased the workshop. Since a few of the slides are multiple tabs, and some with animations, I need to work out how this can be pdf'd
Interesting on the lakhovsky style discs, a friend has been experimenting with them with infrared light, he finds that enhances them. Sunlight certainly will as well. I did make some waterproof samples some years back. The gold plated copper antennas I'd keep dry.
Yes, more work in progress. The water workshop took months. I was just going to do live 90 minute live presentation, but as I thought through the work it became a much more complex presentation. I did my best to make the conceptual and scientific frameworks coherent and comprehensible, I will do a live Q&A soon, haven't scheduled yet.
Hi Gregory, I've made the pdf, it will be in the classroom now, hopefully this will be sufficient. Let me know, happy to work it out so you can access the info easily.
Hey Thomas! Having watched as many of the Borderlands videos I could find that you made with Eric, this is great to find you here still putting out great material - especially on Water and Phi ratio geometry. I'll be adding my name to your class. Thank you!
Thank you, hard to believe almost 40 years ago we were doing those. Some great material, and I'm always thankful for the insights and perspectives that Dollard's work has provided. I'm happy with the water model I've developed, looking at all the various approaches, having found a coherent approach which aligns them all. I hope you find the materials worthy.
after the second water class I have the idea that the hexagonal plates Gerald Pollock described were also proposed by Pierre Robetille for the organization of hydrogen on the Sun. It might someday be found that for the same reasons water doesn't organize as a liquid in the six-sided shape, the sun could not organize its Elementary particles in that shape... Perhaps they are also Phi based, 3-dimentional coherent domains. perhaps the gradient between the shapes generates the electric potential that powers the Birkland currents that interconnects?
Hi Gregory, I've had the same idea. I have a slide on it in my Water Wisdom lecture from a couple years ago — showing the Robitaille metallic hydrogen model alongside Pollack's EZ hexagonal lattice and noting the structural parallel.
Robitaille's case for a condensed solar surface is compelling and his arguments against the standard plasma model deserve serious attention. The hexagonal layered lattice he proposes for metallic hydrogen is geometrically analogous to what Pollack describes for EZ water — and your intuition that the same geometric argument might apply to both is worth sitting with.
I haven't found evidence that hydrogen under solar conditions would organize into φ-based three-dimensional structures in the way water does — hydrogen's bonding options are far more limited than water's, and the icosahedral architecture in water depends critically on the O-H bond angle flexibility and hydrogen bonding network that pure hydrogen doesn't have. So I'd hold the φ-based solar geometry as an open speculation rather than something the current evidence supports.
The Birkeland current connection is genuinely interesting though — if the electric potential driving them arises at a phase boundary or geometric transition zone on the solar surface, that would fit the broader electric universe picture elegantly. Worth watching as Robitaille's model develops.
I have a little feedback for your water series. the slides are impossible to read and I haven't been able to download and print them out. it's nice to see you discussing the slide but I can't read it, even when I projected on the big screen with my phone and zoom in. It's probably made for a desk computer?
perhaps you could offer it as a PDF or a book, that we could purchase.
by the way I've been experimenting with the water structuring disc. I feel like it should be in sunlight?
I also had an idea that it would be good if I could fit it into a container so the water actually touched the disc, but I don't know for certain. I don't have the apparatus to test water such as Schwank or Emoto.
I'm relying on my own sensitive observation and taste buds!
thank you so much for all you're putting into the water series I hope there's more coming!
Thanks for your experience with the slides, I did set them up for mobile as well, but I get your point and the access to the information is essential. I'll work on getting a pdf together that will be supplied to those who purchased the workshop. Since a few of the slides are multiple tabs, and some with animations, I need to work out how this can be pdf'd
Interesting on the lakhovsky style discs, a friend has been experimenting with them with infrared light, he finds that enhances them. Sunlight certainly will as well. I did make some waterproof samples some years back. The gold plated copper antennas I'd keep dry.
Yes, more work in progress. The water workshop took months. I was just going to do live 90 minute live presentation, but as I thought through the work it became a much more complex presentation. I did my best to make the conceptual and scientific frameworks coherent and comprehensible, I will do a live Q&A soon, haven't scheduled yet.
have you seen David lapointe's material?
https://youtu.be/5CQVPPevJO0?si=Ur7D4XlnxvecIzRg
Yes, many years ago, nice to see it remastered, thanks for the link :)
I wonder if Trump's 'Golden Dome' has physics related to the domes in those cathedrals .. https://harvardsciencereview.org/2026/01/22/trumps-golden-dome-its-not-what-you-think/
b t w I know absolutely nothing of physics but am in wonder of nature...
Hi Gregory, I've made the pdf, it will be in the classroom now, hopefully this will be sufficient. Let me know, happy to work it out so you can access the info easily.
Hey Thomas! Having watched as many of the Borderlands videos I could find that you made with Eric, this is great to find you here still putting out great material - especially on Water and Phi ratio geometry. I'll be adding my name to your class. Thank you!
Thank you, hard to believe almost 40 years ago we were doing those. Some great material, and I'm always thankful for the insights and perspectives that Dollard's work has provided. I'm happy with the water model I've developed, looking at all the various approaches, having found a coherent approach which aligns them all. I hope you find the materials worthy.
after the second water class I have the idea that the hexagonal plates Gerald Pollock described were also proposed by Pierre Robetille for the organization of hydrogen on the Sun. It might someday be found that for the same reasons water doesn't organize as a liquid in the six-sided shape, the sun could not organize its Elementary particles in that shape... Perhaps they are also Phi based, 3-dimentional coherent domains. perhaps the gradient between the shapes generates the electric potential that powers the Birkland currents that interconnects?
Hi Gregory, I've had the same idea. I have a slide on it in my Water Wisdom lecture from a couple years ago — showing the Robitaille metallic hydrogen model alongside Pollack's EZ hexagonal lattice and noting the structural parallel.
Robitaille's case for a condensed solar surface is compelling and his arguments against the standard plasma model deserve serious attention. The hexagonal layered lattice he proposes for metallic hydrogen is geometrically analogous to what Pollack describes for EZ water — and your intuition that the same geometric argument might apply to both is worth sitting with.
I haven't found evidence that hydrogen under solar conditions would organize into φ-based three-dimensional structures in the way water does — hydrogen's bonding options are far more limited than water's, and the icosahedral architecture in water depends critically on the O-H bond angle flexibility and hydrogen bonding network that pure hydrogen doesn't have. So I'd hold the φ-based solar geometry as an open speculation rather than something the current evidence supports.
The Birkeland current connection is genuinely interesting though — if the electric potential driving them arises at a phase boundary or geometric transition zone on the solar surface, that would fit the broader electric universe picture elegantly. Worth watching as Robitaille's model develops.